| |
| |
See other
published
opinions,
below |
|
| |
Colorado
HB-1356 (2002) -- The Lie
Phil Weinstein
Pam Rhodes and other
Republican sponsors of HB02-1356 repeatedly assert that the intention of this
bill is to insure that birth certificates "continue" to accurately
reflect the biological mother and father of a child. The importance of this
was the only point made, at length, by one of the few people Rhodes invited
to testify in support of her bill [3-21-2002].
This assertion continues
to be made in the face of the repeated observation that thousands of
birth certificates have been, and continue to be altered in Colorado to obscure
the names of the biological parents of a child -- in cases of adoption.
There is no indication on these birth certificates that the named parents
are not the biological parents -- because that's not really the primary
importance of these legal documents.
Representative Tom
Plant (D) attempted to insure that HB02-1356 responsibly reflected the
intention stated by the bill's sponsors before
his chamber passed the bill on to the Senate. During second reading on the
House floor [3-26-2002,] Plant attempted to introduce an amendment mandating
that birth certificates are to list only a child's biological parents. Obviously,
this would present a very real problem for many heterosexual parents adopting
an infant. (But not -- by the way -- as much of a problem as same-sex parents
would have, being that joint adoption of their own child isn't even legal
in Colorado). Obviously, the Republican House leadership wouldn't allow Plant's
amendment to be considered.
HB02-1356 has nothing
to do with Colorado birth certificates needing to be an accurate record of
biological heredity.
|
Reggie
Rivers, Denver Post
Given
that there are thousands of "altered" birth certificates for
adopted children in Colorado and only 45 reflecting parents of the same
sex, it's curious that Rhodes, Cadman and Musgrave assert the need for
"facts" and "accuracy" by stamping out the 45, while
not saying a word about the thousands.
HB 1356
is evidence of our collective bias against gay people getting in the
way of common sense and fairness. We're so eager to restrict the rights
of gay people that we ignore the innocent people who we hurt along the
way.
... Read
the full article on this website.
|
|
|
|
Julie
C. Tolleson, Equal Rights Colorado
House
sponsor Rep. Pam Rhodes says HB 1356 is only about getting back to the
"original intent" of birth certificates by having them accurately
reflect a child's "mother" and "father."
Tell
that to the couples who are the targets of the bill. Tell that to the
children -- yet unborn -- who will be left with only one adult legally
obligated for their care and well-being. This "accuracy in recordkeeping"
rationale is cut from whole cloth. Colorado law has never required that
a child's parents be married, or that a birth certificate identify parents
only by biology. Birth certificates are about legal responsibilities,
not genetic pedigree.
... Read
the full article on this website.
|
|
|
|